AI, technology & society

Autonomous agents,
evaluation, and oversight

I’m a graduate student at MIT developing technical methods to evaluate, monitor, and shape autonomous agents in multi-agent and human–AI systems.

I’m interested in how agents coordinate, respond to incentives, and behave under oversight—and how we can design these systems to preserve human agency in institutional decision-making.

2025–2026

More research & writing

2026
Occupational prediction · First author · In preparation

O*NetBench

Building a predictive model of AI capability scores for individual occupations, grounded in worker evaluations of occupational tasks.

Pace of AI progress · Co-author

Crashing Waves vs. Rising Tides

Estimated task-duration doubling times by worker-rated quality:

Rating ≥7 · Minimally sufficient
2.7 months
Rating ≥8 · Average-worker quality or better
2.4 months
Rating 9 · Superior quality
1.6 months

Each quality threshold defines success: a response either meets that rating or falls below it. The fitted model estimates how quickly task duration doubles while holding the probability of meeting the threshold constant. Duration is measured in human work time; the estimates are sensitive to the fitted relationship between ratings and duration.

A little more about me

At MIT, I study technology and policy and electrical engineering and computer science. My research spans reward hacking in AI research agents, oversight of interacting agents, and worker evaluations of AI capabilities.

Before MIT, I was a machine learning engineer at Coursera, the first engineer at Dreambound, and a project lead at the University of Pittsburgh’s AI and Social Good Lab. I studied economics and computer science at Swarthmore.

Across these projects, I keep coming back to a practical question: when a system appears to be doing the right thing, what evidence should convince us?

Get in touch

I’d be glad to compare notes on research.

meiri@mit.edu ↗